4.6 Changes

[Unspeakable1]

Devs, as always, are here reading.

leroy

The idea isn't that you're not reading, I assume you are. It's that it obviously does ZERO good posting here.

The other option is for every player to mass rate the game a whopping 1 out of 5 stars on Google Play (or whatever the Apple equivalent is). Which works better to motivate you Devs, leroy?

[leroy]

The idea isn't that you're not reading, I assume you are. It's that it obviously does ZERO good posting here.

The other option is for every player to mass rate the game a whopping 1 out of 5 stars on Google Play (or whatever the Apple equivalent is). Which works better to motivate you Devs, leroy?

Yes, threats are clearly the best option.

[Unspeakable1]

Yes, threats are clearly the best option.

Clearly encouragement, patience, solutions offered, bugs reported, and/or positive/negative feedback didn't help win a better playing experience. What's left? Help us help you.

[Thorr]

The idea isn't that you're not reading, I assume you are. It's that it obviously does ZERO good posting here.

The other option is for every player to mass rate the game a whopping 1 out of 5 stars on Google Play (or whatever the Apple equivalent is). Which works better to motivate you Devs, leroy?

Ok but 1 rating why?

If its about mono domination then I am in and my teammates too..

Its far too irritating..

[Seaweed]

Clearly encouragement, patience, solutions offered, bugs reported, and/or positive/negative feedback didn't help win a better playing experience. What's left? Help us help you.

No need to threaten. If the dev makes bad update, its their loss when the player leaves and they lose money

[Unspeakable1]

Ok but 1 rating why?

If its about mono domination then I am in and my teammates too..

Its far too irritating..

For me? Dear God, where to start besides the same crap I've been spouting for a while now. Patron options are always skewed, reduced efficacy of multiple strategy options, limiting players to a few strategies that work (hence the constant rise of mono), updates are always OP/broken which require nerfing and puts us in this never ending cycle, updates are so infrequent and sub par when they do come out so make the wait pointless (at least make the updates worth the wait!), building costs are ridiculous to the point that i might as well switch solely to CoC (at least they update consistently each year), great players leaving because they can't even stand the game anymore. Is that a good enough reason for a 1 star rating?

To make my point clearer, we are talking a game centered around Greek Mythology. There is literally no shortage of ideas for updates. More than just myself have offered PLENTY of content/solutions to problems. They could literally introduce some new thing every three months and have plenty to keep the game fresh for YEARS to come. Currently even the "Gods of Olympus" are incomplete after how many years? Sorry if what I'm saying stings, but it's the effin truth. I'm glad at least that I'm part of a great alliance and like seeing them every evening otherwise I'd be saying adios like some of the rest of older players.

Seaweed,
Even if players leave but don't rate the game accordingly, new players will fill in the gap and make up the loss in profit. Bad rating reduces new players, thus the loss of veterans hurts the pocketbook more. Not a threat. It's a strategy to motivate when all other options have been exhausted.

[Thorr]

For me? Dear God, where to start besides the same crap I've been spouting for a while now. Patron options are always skewed, reduced efficacy of multiple strategy options, limiting players to a few strategies that work (hence the constant rise of mono), updates are always OP/broken which require nerfing and puts us in this never ending cycle, updates are so infrequent and sub par when they do come out so make the wait pointless (at least make the updates worth the wait!), building costs are ridiculous to the point that i might as well switch solely to CoC (at least they update consistently each year), great players leaving because they can't even stand the game anymore. Is that a good enough reason for a 1 star rating?

To make my point clearer, we are talking a game centered around Greek Mythology. There is literally no shortage of ideas for updates. More than just myself have offered PLENTY of content/solutions to problems. They could literally introduce some new thing every three months and have plenty to keep the game fresh for YEARS to come. Currently even the "Gods of Olympus" are incomplete after how many years? Sorry if what I'm saying stings, but it's the effin truth. I'm glad at least that I'm part of a great alliance and like seeing them every evening otherwise I'd be saying adios like some of the rest of older players.

Seaweed,
Even if players leave but don't rate the game accordingly, new players will fill in the gap and make up the loss in profit. Bad rating reduces new players, thus the loss of veterans hurts the pocketbook more. Not a threat. It's a strategy to motivate when all other options have been exhausted.

Well...

No one really cares beyond Monkogod domination at the moment.

Monogods might be bringing them quick revenues so they keep promoting that strategy and nothing wrong with it as business point of view.

And trust me no matter what you do or think, nothing really is going to happen even if you give 1 rating, write here or whatever. You got just couple of options keep playing or leave..

Other than just mono dominance everything is great at the moment.

Just my opinion nothing personal.

You can disagree, I respect that.

[Seaweed]

Most people care more about op centaurs than Monogod from what I have seen

[Unspeakable1]

Or OP Zeus patron camping out in a corner

[Unspeakable1]

Bug with UW gods dying and not leaving your line up still active. Please fix!

[ok2]

When will we get easy and hard battle mode in uw

[Seaweed]

When will we get easy and hard battle mode in uw

Doubt there will

[ok2]

Too bad.. would be fun to see hard mode